Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Cathar · 02-26-2006, 08:22 PM

Additionally, the call for Tjunction was not intended as a pure measure of cooling device performance. Seems that this point has been lost, confused, and reused as attack material over time.

The call for Tjunction was for data with respect to measuring the variances in 8jc.

It was stated then, and still is now, that if 8jc is proven, rather than assumed, to always be of minimal consequence, then Tcase would then be a perfectly acceptable measure of cooling device performance.

Again, faith alone is not enough for some, and in the light of incongruent results, unjustified.

02-26-2006, 08:22 PM	#5
Cathar Thermophile Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 2,538	Re: T junction temp Additionally, the call for Tjunction was not intended as a pure measure of cooling device performance. Seems that this point has been lost, confused, and reused as attack material over time. The call for Tjunction was for data with respect to measuring the variances in 8jc. It was stated then, and still is now, that if 8jc is proven, rather than assumed, to always be of minimal consequence, then Tcase would then be a perfectly acceptable measure of cooling device performance. Again, faith alone is not enough for some, and in the light of incongruent results, unjustified.