Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Cathar · 03-02-2006, 06:25 PM

If Tj is a "convenient fiction", then if I understand the concerns of both Incoherent and Bobo (which strangely mimic my initial concerns that I raised privately to you some time back), they are stating that Tc is just as much of a "convenient fiction" as it is just as much of a simplistic assumption as Tj would then be.

Can't have it both ways. If it's going to be a simplistic one-value assumption, then Tj is just as invalid as Tc. Can't invalidate the applicability of one without then logically invalidating the applicability of the other.

03-02-2006, 06:25 PM	#31
Cathar Thermophile Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 2,538	Re: T junction temp If Tj is a "convenient fiction", then if I understand the concerns of both Incoherent and Bobo (which strangely mimic my initial concerns that I raised privately to you some time back), they are stating that Tc is just as much of a "convenient fiction" as it is just as much of a simplistic assumption as Tj would then be. Can't have it both ways. If it's going to be a simplistic one-value assumption, then Tj is just as invalid as Tc. Can't invalidate the applicability of one without then logically invalidating the applicability of the other.