Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Long Haired Git · 04-23-2006, 11:51 PM

Series is easier. Parallel flow halves flow rate through each rad, but flow vs C/W is basically flat. Parallel reduces PQ from them both but compared the blocks the rad resistance is basically irrelevant.
Did I mention series is easier?

Oh, we're talking about coolant flow series, not air series.

04-23-2006, 11:51 PM	#48
Long Haired Git Cooling Savant Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sydney, Oz Posts: 336	Re: PA120.3 vs HE120.3 vs PA160 Series is easier. Parallel flow halves flow rate through each rad, but flow vs C/W is basically flat. Parallel reduces PQ from them both but compared the blocks the rad resistance is basically irrelevant. Did I mention series is easier? Oh, we're talking about coolant flow series, not air series. __________________ Long Haired Git "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." (Prof. Gene Spafford) My Rig, in all its glory, can be seen best here AMD XP1600 @ 1530 Mhz \| Soyo Dragon + \| 256 Mb PC2700 DDRAM \| 2 x 40 Gb 7200rpm in Raid-0 \| Maze 2, eheim 1250, dual heater cores! \| Full specifications (PCDB)