Pro/Forums - View Single Post

-=Mr_B=- · 07-01-2006, 12:21 PM

Dont know exacly how great the impact is, but connecting a bunch of radiators the way i think you mean, on different distane from the plugged end of the "distributor tube" gives the radiator connected closest to the plugged end most water, and the one closest to the inlet least.

Forgive me, i feal my linguistics fail me, so some crude ansi, if i may...

===|#1#2#3#4#| (imagine this to be a pipe, connected to the hose, on the left side(work with me here, please))

The numbers are the 4 outlet connectors, 1 gets least, 4 gets most water flow, simply due to the water trying to continue straight forward. For an even flow, 3 Y's and a bunch of "exacly as long tubes" on both in, and outlet, would performe better. However, i dont know if it would be more resistive and hence kill performance through lower over all flowrate.

B!

07-01-2006, 12:21 PM	#11
-=Mr_B=- Cooling Neophyte Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Sweden Posts: 12	Re: Heatercore series or parallell Dont know exacly how great the impact is, but connecting a bunch of radiators the way i think you mean, on different distane from the plugged end of the "distributor tube" gives the radiator connected closest to the plugged end most water, and the one closest to the inlet least. Forgive me, i feal my linguistics fail me, so some crude ansi, if i may... ===\|#1#2#3#4#\| (imagine this to be a pipe, connected to the hose, on the left side(work with me here, please)) The numbers are the 4 outlet connectors, 1 gets least, 4 gets most water flow, simply due to the water trying to continue straight forward. For an even flow, 3 Y's and a bunch of "exacly as long tubes" on both in, and outlet, would performe better. However, i dont know if it would be more resistive and hence kill performance through lower over all flowrate. B!