View Single Post
Unread 10-14-2006, 03:35 AM   #379
Phoenix32
Thermophile
 
Phoenix32's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: Snap OS 3.4.805, anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMorgan

yes, I read notices, and I also realize that if someone takes pity on me, and contacts me off the board, then that's between them and I. I can hope, anyway.
All well and good, but let's not get the forum in trouble in the process eh? In other words, not be so blatant about your request to people.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMorgan

As far as capacities, Why are all the M4100 replacement drives 160GB capacity?
4x160 raid 5=480gb if I still remember second grade math and raid fundamentals.
P/N 5325301671 is what I'm referencing.
Was snap playing games with formatted capacity? Does the 160 format down to 137, and thus your 480 is really only 411?
Because in a lot of cases, 160 GB drives are cheaper than 120 GB drives. Anyone who has been building RAID arrarys since 1985 and working with MFM/RLL/ESDI since long before that should know this. It's called economics. See? I can be condescending too.

Bottom line, since you are an old hand, the 4100 DOES NOT support LBA 48-bit. Which means data above 137 GB. So yes, they use 160 GB drives, but they format down to 137 GB each (well, close).


Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMorgan

I know to match drives.. I've been building raids since 1985, and worked with MFM / RLL / ESDI long before that.
Me too...
Phoenix32 is offline   Reply With Quote