Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Phoenix32 · 10-14-2006, 11:35 PM

The Gigabit is a better odds deal IMO. Sometimes the support components are different and sometimes not. The only way to know for sure it to swap the chip and find out... My SNAPs are in use and I cannot afford to attempt the hack, but if you have a unit (MB) you can play with, then...... It would help to know what GB chip was used by Adaptec in the GB SNAP (not guardian) servers. Sorry, that I do not know.

David, I forget, which of the SNAP servers was Gigabit that was not Guardian? The 4400 and 14000 are both Guardian right? 12000? I know I saw one was, I just can't remember which one it was....

10-14-2006, 11:35 PM	#383
Phoenix32 Thermophile Join Date: May 2006 Location: Yakima, WA Posts: 1,282	Re: Snap OS 3.4.805, anyone? The Gigabit is a better odds deal IMO. Sometimes the support components are different and sometimes not. The only way to know for sure it to swap the chip and find out... My SNAPs are in use and I cannot afford to attempt the hack, but if you have a unit (MB) you can play with, then...... It would help to know what GB chip was used by Adaptec in the GB SNAP (not guardian) servers. Sorry, that I do not know. David, I forget, which of the SNAP servers was Gigabit that was not Guardian? The 4400 and 14000 are both Guardian right? 12000? I know I saw one was, I just can't remember which one it was....