Pro/Forums - View Single Post

jontz · 11-29-2006, 03:11 PM

Well, Mr. Bone picker, thanks for the info. This so called rumor started when various 4000 users stated their read/write speeds, which were MUCH slower than my 4100. I don't know all the details of their setups, and couldn't even point you to specific posts (maybe they were emails), but they were talking read speeds in the 4 MB/sec range, vs my 10.5 MB/sec range. That's partly where it got started, but I have a feeling that I wasn't the origin of the debate, I just added to it.

11-29-2006, 03:11 PM	#3
jontz Cooling Savant Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: South Bend, IN Posts: 385	Re: 4000 versus 4100 Well, Mr. Bone picker, thanks for the info. This so called rumor started when various 4000 users stated their read/write speeds, which were MUCH slower than my 4100. I don't know all the details of their setups, and couldn't even point you to specific posts (maybe they were emails), but they were talking read speeds in the 4 MB/sec range, vs my 10.5 MB/sec range. That's partly where it got started, but I have a feeling that I wasn't the origin of the debate, I just added to it. __________________ Snap Server 4100, 4x120GB Seagate Drives, RAID 5, version 3.4.803