Pro/Forums - View Single Post - D-Tek Fuzion Testing

SiGfever · 01-14-2007, 09:17 AM

I have to agree, the results were too far off to be accurate. How is that for TIM cure time? I also like the way the amount of burn-in time changed. I guess they had some kind of "feeling" for when it was right.

What we need is to have tests done on one test bed with C2D and Quad core CPU. Then single die CPU testing would give us a better all around picture.

01-14-2007, 09:17 AM	#8
SiGfever Cooling Neophyte Join Date: May 2006 Location: Virginia, USA Posts: 53	Re: D-Tek Fuzion Testing I have to agree, the results were too far off to be accurate. How is that for TIM cure time? I also like the way the amount of burn-in time changed. I guess they had some kind of "feeling" for when it was right. What we need is to have tests done on one test bed with C2D and Quad core CPU. Then single die CPU testing would give us a better all around picture. __________________ U2-UFO; Corsair HX620W; Q6600 "GO" (L723A) vid=1.2125v @3.61Ghz 1.32v; P5K Premium; Ballistix 6400c4 4x1Gb; eVga eGeforce 7600GT KO 256mb; Samsung 245BW; Klipsch Promedia 2.1; FuZion; DDC-2 w/ AlphaCool top; PA120.3 rad_push/pull; 7/16" Tubing. (In progress) MCW30; EK Asus3a Acetal Mosfet; MCX159-CU; MCR220; 3/8" tubing. Sigmund Freud said..."Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".