Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phoenix32
So let me get this right.
- Just because every single 4 x 320 GB 4000 setup we have seen or heard of has had various "problems" is just coincidence?
- David digging up the documentation on the OS it is built from, which flat out said there is a 1TB limitation, doesn't matter?
- A full formal education in analog and digital electronic engineering and 30 years of hands on tech work in the field "opinion" is worthless just because someone on a forum with a malfunctioning SNAP Server said so?
Nevermind, please don't answer...
|
Phoenix, I am very sorry I hurt your feelings. That was not my intention.
FYI, I am a senior systems programmer, and have been in the field for over 25 years. I also have extensive electronic experience. I don't consider experience worth much if you can't use it to point to a specific reason whys someone will not work. What does matter is when something does work and you experience it. If you look at it from my point of view you can clearly see how ridiculous it sounds. I have it working. but you tell me it cant work. I guess I'll trust 'the horses mouth' experience over your opinion any day. I am sorry you don't like it and it contradicts much of what you have posted here, but there it is.
Your three bullets in order:
1) because some have had problems does not mean everyone will. (10 people with broken legs couldn’t run a marathon, therefore it's not possible) - logical fallacy. not to mention there are other who have gotten 250+ drive raids working and posted here. infact, there are very few who have tried larger drives that have posted anything here.
2) "is built from" is the key phrase here - it means nothing. you have no idea what modifications were made.
3) again, this is opinion, that is, your belief. Belief does not hold up against the reality of experience. Experience wins.