View Single Post
Unread 04-11-2008, 01:29 PM   #4
Phoenix32
Thermophile
 
Phoenix32's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: 48 bit snap server 4100??

I suspect your "Location" says it all, however...

In one sense it would be a good thing because it would allow those with 4100's to be able to put larger drives in, and many people have wanted that.

But, in another sense, it is almost a waste. Why? Because I had several 4000's with 1 TB in them and it drove me nuts. Go ahead, try moving say 200 or 300 GB of data over 100baseT. Hell with that! I supose if you wanted it just for say an MP3 Library, you would only have to do the l-o-n-g transfer once, but it would still stink IMO.

To each their own, but this is why I have Guardian units.
Phoenix32 is offline   Reply With Quote