View Single Post
Unread 10-15-2008, 02:02 PM   #6
Phoenix32
Thermophile
 
Phoenix32's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: Snap 410 on Single Subnet - Load Balancing or Failover??

Yes, I am aware I am just a big ole meany. But Geeech..... If he had been reading on it as he indicated, he would have seen this was beyond him and his equipment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue68f100 View Post
Let me see, I have a GigE managed switch and a SMB routers that supports these and both support vlans, too. And I am using vlan.
Heh, but you are not him and you do have that type equipment and knowledge to make an informed decision.


Quote:
Originally Posted by blue68f100 View Post
But it does sound like he needs to read up on what he is tring to do.
Ya think!


Quote:
Originally Posted by blue68f100 View Post
With only 1 switch I would not bother.
I myself would change that to read, "with only 1 unmanaged switch", JMO


Quote:
Originally Posted by blue68f100 View Post
I prefer using reserved IP over static IP. This will assign the IP of your choosing based on MAC address. This way the snap can be set to DHCP and if your forced to move it, it will always get an IP address.
Ditto... Let the DHCP deal with it (reserved IP based on MAC)
Phoenix32 is offline   Reply With Quote