Quote:
Originally Posted by ZazaBB
Actually, I have to agree with the majority of your sentiments comparing other models to the 410. The CPU temp is HOT... wayyyy more than I expected. The only saving grace of this unit compared to others is the DEPTH. I only have a 520 and 4100 to compare, but the short depth is handy for what I am using it for.
|
The 4400 is about the same depth as 410, and the 4200/4500/15000 are somewhere in between the 520 and 410.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZazaBB
I'm using a Dell PowerEdge 2900 for my multimedia server and overall server.
|
I don't want to pay your electric bill!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZazaBB
14TB total RAID storage. (Yeah, I am nuts.)
|
LMFAO!
I guess you didn't notice that I have a ton of units, including SD30 and two SanBloc S50 expansion units. I don't use anything less than a 500GB drive anymore (and prefer the 2TB drives mostly)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZazaBB
Unfortunately, I didn't RTFM before I went back to the Snap's.... my MAIN concern was know who was online at any time.... the OLD Snap OS allowed seeing ANY user, not just Windows attached, but everything including HTTP. Guardian apparently NEVER allowed that.... so I gained some transfer speed and extra storage, but not what I originally wanted it for. It does really make me wonder why an Enterprise unit would NOT show you ALL active users or at LEAST open files.... neither can be done for an HTTP user. It's not even in the log files! I would think that the Sarbanes–Oxley Act would impact at least SOME of their clients using a Snap, so why there is absolutely no record of HTTP transactions stymies me no end.
|
I am just a hardware guy, you are gonna have to talk to David, the moderator, about this stuff. BUT! I think you can see everyone who is connected and log it all. I could be wrong.