Quote:
Originally Posted by ZazaBB
I uploaded a screen shot from the 410 Status Page.
As you see, it's set to Gigabit full duplex.
I've been at this 32 years, and everything I know to try I have done. I've even put the source system and the 410 on the same segment with no difference.
The drives are 7200RPM so that shouldn't be an issue either. I'm at a loss for what can be wrong.
The 520 is on a different network, so the speed is most likely an issue with what was going on at the time. When I had it connected to this system, it did copy about as fast as the PowerEdge 2900.
Let me know if you see something on the screen shot or have any other suggestions.
Thanks
|
Very strange indeed. I have a 410 (OS 5.1.046) with nearly an identical setup as yours with the exception of the memory (I'm still at 256mb) and the drives (4x 153mb RAID5). I just ran a few file copy tests using TeraCopy out of curiosity and I'm sort of at a loss on what the lag/latency issue could be for you. It appears these things' speeds vary greatly depending on the environment they're in. The home directories feature is the only reason I haven't retired this thing yet in all honesty because a $500 entry level HP server blows it out of the water when it comes to transfer speeds.
1.75gb ISO file speeds using TeraCopy (all components are Gigabit full-duplex)
Snap 410: ~27 mb/s
Snap 4100: ~19 mb/s
ProLiant ML110 w/Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit: ~92 mb/s
Is there anything between your PC and the 410 other than a switch stack? Perhaps any VLANs that are routed through your firewall or anything else that could be limiting your speed?