View Single Post
Unread 03-06-2002, 11:22 PM   #18
Brad
Thermophile
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Nuu Zeeelin
Posts: 3,175
Default

Quote:
lol.. if they did take the route of rdram systems... i with pc800 or even the newer ram that is coming out... it would topple p4 systems even more perhaps even macs... think about it..

as i said before, the athlon can't handle the bandwidth of rambust, and the increased latencies of rambust would slow the athlon down. I'd say kt133a would be faster than a rambust chipset

Quote:
I heard from a reliable source that Intel is now using 266 ram, instead of PC-800!! Too bad, the pc-800 is WAY FASTER!!
Yeah, that reliable source is everywhere for the last 3 months. Actually, the bandwidth of 2100mb/sec vs 3200mb/sec isn't as much as the names of pc266 and pc800 would let you imagine. Generally the sis645 with pc333 is faster than 850 with rambust, and all the other pc266 chipsets are 5% slower to the same speed as the 850 with rambust. And because rambust doesn't like very high speeds, you'll probably get much better performance when overclocking with ddr anyway
__________________
2x P3 1100's at 1400, Abit VP6, 2x Corsair 256mb PC150 sticks, 20gb 'cuda ATA-III, 2x 40gb 'cuda ATA-IV in raid 0. 20" Trinitron. No fans

2x 2400+ at 2288mhz (16.0 x 143), Iwill MPX2, 2x Kingmax PC-3200 256mb sticks, 4x 20gb 60gxp in Raid 5 on a Promise SX6000. Asus Ti4200 320/630. Cooled by Water
Brad is offline