Quote:
Originally posted by redleader:
A T might be better if you were willing to play with flowrates. Since I don't have anyway to check flowrates other then checking chip temps I wouldn't bother. Instead I'd just go all inline. Figure running water through the CPU only increases its temp a few degrees if you have good flow. Thats maybe a 3C higher NB/GPU temp then with the T.
Meanwhile you aren't depriving your CPU of any flow.
|
Thnaks for reply redleader.
Quick question:
Which way would facilitate highest flow through cpu block.
1) All inline with 3/8 id tubing until it gets to the small blocks(that use 1/4 id tubing).
2) Split after radiator one with 3/8 id for cpu and going back into res independently of the other split. The other split getting reduced down to 1/4 id then going through nb/gpu then returning to res independently.
Any other opinions or thoughts?
Thanks
__________________
Water Cooled Inwin Q500 (Dual Rads: Rad1 = DTEK Pro Core | Rad2 = Blick Ice Estreme, Hydor L30, Dangerden Maze2, Bay Res Typhoon Reservoir, 1/2 " DD Tygon Thick Wall Hose).
Flow: Res, Pump, CPU watervlock, Y into both rads, both rads into res independently.
Athlon XP 1800+ (@ 1731 - 150mhz fsb.), on a Asus A7N266-c, and a Radeon 9000 *waiting for RMA'd Saphire 9800 ultra from Newegg)
|