Pro/Forums - View Single Post - common that review wasnt the worst.... for the space 2002

Brad · 04-22-2002, 02:11 PM

I thought it was very bad because that is the sort of kit some newbie is going to buy, and they mightn't test for leaks.

I read the review before I read Una's news post, and I honestly thought it was quite a poor kit. Not only leak issues, but the block looked like shit on the inside, the rad is small, etc.

I'm backing Una here, not because he's pro/staff, heck me and him don't get on half the time, I'm backing him because I think he's right.

04-22-2002, 02:11 PM	#5
Brad Thermophile Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nuu Zeeelin Posts: 3,175	I thought it was very bad because that is the sort of kit some newbie is going to buy, and they mightn't test for leaks. I read the review before I read Una's news post, and I honestly thought it was quite a poor kit. Not only leak issues, but the block looked like shit on the inside, the rad is small, etc. I'm backing Una here, not because he's pro/staff, heck me and him don't get on half the time, I'm backing him because I think he's right. __________________ 2x P3 1100's at 1400, Abit VP6, 2x Corsair 256mb PC150 sticks, 20gb 'cuda ATA-III, 2x 40gb 'cuda ATA-IV in raid 0. 20" Trinitron. No fans 2x 2400+ at 2288mhz (16.0 x 143), Iwill MPX2, 2x Kingmax PC-3200 256mb sticks, 4x 20gb 60gxp in Raid 5 on a Promise SX6000. Asus Ti4200 320/630. Cooled by Water