View Single Post
Unread 04-27-2002, 02:08 AM   #19
redleader
Thermophile
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The deserts of Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Wow, so much venom.
Ack I did come off as a dick there. Sorry, no offense intended.

Quote:
I can't find the comment on performance so maybe that is not accurate. The impellor spindle on the Eheims runs in a ceramic bearing that is lubricated by the water being pumped, that is why they have to be primed before use - so the bearing surface gets some lubricant.
When you said bearings, I though "ball bearings". Anyway I see what you are saying, so yes the coolant does lubricate it, but it doesn't matter if its submerged or not.

Quote:
You quote 80%, would you care to present your test setup and measurments taken to validate this? Or is it bs?
BS of course. I'm not sure how I could simulate the resistance of a cooling setup, minimize heat loss and measure acturately enough to derive a good figure for watts. However my 1250 runs fairly cool to the touch (much much cooler then a hard disk nearby with more air flow and much less power radiated). Therefore I reasoned that 4/5 of the heat was entering the coolant.

Regardless with heatercores easily handleing several hundred watts, the difference between 10 or 20w is irrelevent.

Quote:
Eheim's do not use the same drive system as a Danner so you can not compare them as far as bearings or lack thereof.
I've never opened a Danner, I was refering to the generic class of pumps with an impellor floating on a magnetic field. Is this the wrong name ?:shrug:
redleader is offline   Reply With Quote