Ok, after reading the last three posts, this looks more like a Doctorate Thesis, than it does a review on WaterBlocks.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure that if and when you figure out how to test WaterBlocks (with the degree of accuracy you have listed) that no doubt you will have a great deal of information to provide for your readers. However, I believe the vast Majority of people will skip all of your hard work, and go straight to the conclusions as most people don't really care about
Applied Power, Clamping Force, Thermodynamic testing, etc. This of course is my opinion, but I would say from the lack of others posts in this thread, that I'm probably correct.
If after all your testing, you are off by a less than a degree, who cares. It's not like the people reading your eventual review will have the same conditions in which you tested anyway. What I and others want to know is, which watercooling equipment would give me the best performance (to further overclock my system as that is really the point of watercooling isn't it).
Hope I'm not sounding too harsh, but these posts remind me too much of college lectures on stuff I could care less about. I'm a bottom line kind of guy, I don't mind reading information that I can use (which waterblock clamps onto the CPU the easiest, which has the best tube connectors, etc), but your methods of testing are far to rigid for my tastes.