View Single Post
Unread 06-14-2002, 02:01 PM   #18
chazz469
Cooling Savant
 
chazz469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bigben2k
You'll get better performance from your original idea of running the rads in parallel.

The flow rate drop is normal. 164 is very nice. Avoid elbows at all costs.
How? I've heard that running rads in parallel can give better performance, but I've also heard that it depends on how you have it set up. I think that this application would come out better in serial.

And I was suggesting that 500GPH might be too fast to be truly effective. From what I've read best performance comes from about half that (depending on the rig). N'est-ce pas?
__________________
"I believe that the moment is near when by a procedure of active paranoiac thought, it will be possible to systematize confusion to the total discrediting of the world of reality"
-Salvador Dali

AMD XP1600+ @1790MHz and rethinking my cooling....
MAZE3 --> DD Cooler Cube --> Eheim 1048
512MB PC2700 DDR
MSI KT3 Ultra-ARU
2x 20GB Maxtor in RAID 0
1x 30GB Maxtor --> WinXP
GF3 Ti200 @ 240/499
chazz469 is offline   Reply With Quote