[quote] Originally posted by bigben2k
Well, it's simple really: the waterblock benefits from a higher flow rate, as it keeps the block as close to the water temp as possible.[quote]
But if the flow rate is too fast, does the block have enough time to transfer the heat to the water?
Quote:
|
because you're using rads in parallel, there is a little bit less resistance to waterflow, so your overall flow rate will increase, just a little bit, but that's ok, because it's still 50-50% for the rads, plus the waterblock likes it. It's overall better, any way you look at it.
|
So what if he split the line to go to the rads, then reunited them for the blocks?
__________________
"I believe that the moment is near when by a procedure of active paranoiac thought, it will be possible to systematize confusion to the total discrediting of the world of reality"
-Salvador Dali
AMD XP1600+ @1790MHz and rethinking my cooling....
MAZE3 --> DD Cooler Cube --> Eheim 1048
512MB PC2700 DDR
MSI KT3 Ultra-ARU
2x 20GB Maxtor in RAID 0
1x 30GB Maxtor --> WinXP
GF3 Ti200 @ 240/499
|