View Single Post
Unread 07-21-2002, 10:59 AM   #41
ECUPirate
Hottest Stank of them All
 
ECUPirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Washington, DC area
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
I'd add a note to ECUPirate (and I missed that apparent exchange with BillA). More small holes doesn't mean less flow resistance. For a given total cross sectional area, you'll see the lowest flow restriction from a single round channel. You can approximate the effect of varying hole size and quantity with equations, but with the twists and turns in a typical setup it's generally nothing more than a good estimate. Qualitatively assessing a design is one thing, quantitatively assessing it is a whole 'nother ball game.
OK. Let me rephrase... I understand that one channel w/ area 'x' would have less resistance than several channels w/ combined area 'x'. That makes perfect sense. However, a single channel may not be the best design for heat dissipation. My question was basically this: If you have a row of say, 8 holes, and you add another row of 8 holes (all holes the same size), would you not increase flow AND lower total resistance in the block?
__________________
Does a radioactive cat have 18 half lifes? --Kenny

my pimpin' rig: ...previously poorly cooled...
486DX-2 66mhz @ 75mhz, 4Mb ram, shared, 256Mb hard drive
Onboard VGA, watercooled, of course
16-color monitor, labtec speakers, 28kbs USRobotics modem
Windows XP (think about it)
Maze 3, DDen GF3 block, Eheim 1250, econoline van HC, 1/2" hose w/ 5/8" fittings Comair 172mm fan
ECUPirate is offline   Reply With Quote