Quote:
Originally posted by gone_fishin
If you were to change your goals instead of saying this is the order, block A, B, C, ...... then you would have a more valid review. If you were to say for example that your goals are to find a group of blocks that SEEM to perform up to standards where as this other group of blocks do not SEEM to perform up to standards then you would have results more closely matching your abillities to test. You could make your review also focus on the physical aspects of all the blocks, how they mechanically work, how they mount, how flat is the base, how they look etc, etc. This would be a very interesting review then instead of the piss-ant types that try to declare a winner that we are used to seeing.
|
Sorry I was gone for the big fight. I was watching all day and just when I turn my back look what you kids are up to.
Ok in the final part I will be rating the blocks against each other and at that time they will be ranked on different merrits. Mounting mechanism, fit, finnish, construction, cost, performance, and wheather or not it helps ocability. These are examples of what could be covered. You see the whole reason I've posted the test procedure is to ask how it should be modified to better test. How I should do this or that. This is all open for debate not set in stone.
What whould any of you like to see them rated on.
Ok phman I'll keep all 5 and show the margin for error for each set but If I get something way out I will through out all data and redoo it. Is that better?
#rotor Ok since It will not be as exact as wanted. I will use the mounting that comes with the blocks. If it makes them perform badly thats their fault and they will recieve bad marks for it. Can;t wait to ge tmy hands on a btms. I'm not sutre what will happen but it should be interesting.
Come on guys this is what I wanted or needed but lets keep it constructive. I cant just stop with it now. There are to many things involved so the first round will be for the consumer but I still need to know if I should make canges to my testing procedure. Any responses welcome.