Quote:
Originally posted by decodeddiesel
Damn It!! I wanted to stay out of this but I am confused here. G_F if in fact he could not show the difference between blocks with his proposed test set-up (whether you mean due to ACCURACY OR PRECISION I do not know) then how could he possibly seperate the tested blocks into "GO" or "NO-GO" catagories? Are you suggesting he base this purely on on asthetics? Without any testing it is simply a matter of "this one looks shitty...this one looks good" from his oppinion. I guess I am just confused as to what you are suggesting he do here??
|
Reread my posts. I propose he could not tell the difference to come up with an order of block performance..A, B, C. What I said was he could only validate this by having a goal which matches his testing abillities eg. These blocks over here SEEM to perform good and these blocks over here do not SEEM to perform good.
The conclusions would then be a more honest representation of the testing abillities which are limited by the equiptment he possesses. And I mean that BOTH accuracy and precision are lacking here.
Good waterblock reviews are few and far between. A good proper approach at this introductory review by webmedic will leave the door open for more technical and accurate reviews by him in the future if he follows through with his desires to obtain better testing equiptment.
