Quote:
Originally posted by mkosem
the problem is no one was really making personal attacks or saying "THE REVIEW SUCKS." We were merely pointing out it's flaws.
--Matt
|
then HONESTLY, if what you state was true, i personally think you guys don't deserve to get banned.
but do understand there's a diffrence between
choice 1 "your review had a lot of flaws and its not that good"
and
choice 2 "the review was not bad, but i think the it lacked more in-depth data and certain criterias were overlooked"
altho its referreing to the same matter, it does give the admin (in this case kyle or steve) a very diffrent effect.. if you said choice 1 then maybe their thinking your shitting on their review or something.. but if you said something like choice 2..then i don't think the ban was fair nor necessary
