Thread: [H] WB roundup
View Single Post
Unread 10-04-2002, 07:32 PM   #122
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

wake up call to Bill Adams
hello, hello ?

cancel my previous post, the hard (ne soft) forum just banned me too
as I was trying to respond to King Steve
so here it is (as he is obviously reading the forum-he-loves-to-hate)

quote
reality check Steve
I am not procooling, thats Joe Kelly et all
I write an occasional article for Joe Citarella, thats overclockers.com
I do not 'do' roundups or shootouts, just technical articles; product reviews are for wannabe techie websites

I have many more posts here than at procooling, so . . . ?

it seems you have a 'personality' filter you apply to technical information
give it up
a good idea knows no source

why not address the measurement uncertainty issue I've raised ?
your and procooling's enmity is not relevant
you asked for data, I gave you data



since you did not test the Innovatek (?) or the Dtek TC-4 (?) our only basis for comparison is the Swiftech MCW462-U
->> but since you do not know what your flow was, what do you know ?
well, with this pump and that rad . . . .
come on Steve, you have a single point on a curve - and you don't have a clue as to where it is

I won't trouble you with any more questions (that you decline to answer)
because I'm beginning to suspect that the whole thing is a bit beyond your technical understanding

did you notice in BrkDncr's post he repeated your totally incorrect thermo babble ?
"If a block can transfer more heat into the water"

is this helping your audience ?

be cool
end quote

hi ho
the thread was here if they did not spike it

ah Joe, who would have believed it - you and Steve are the only ones to have banned me
hmmm . . .
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote