Quote:
Originally posted by bigben2k
IMO, the right engine penetrated the building, as the plane (a 757) hit the wall, at roughly 50 degrees, turning counter-clockwise to finish the impact.
|
That doesnt explain the lack of structural damage at 2nd and 3rd floors (just after impact). How did the plane get "flatter" ?
How convenient... That would be an historical first. Boeing will be very interested when the archives fo public, indeed... And they burned in mid air, without slamming the wall or touching the grass... Instant disintegration ! Wow.
Quote:
The last links you provided may have innacurate information, or even propaganda.
|
Prove it. I want facts, not "these people talk bullshit" or "they are commies, liars and terrorists"... Just facts.
The oddity is that, an oddity. The 'intact' SUV, the standing barrels.. Weird.
Quote:
That particular section of the Pentagon had in fact just been rebuilt, and reinforced. (...) the type of reinforcement applied specifically to limit injuries due to flying glass, from the windows (from a bomb).
|
Exactly. That doesnt make the structure stronger... Blast absorbent materials are quite 'plastic', and very resilient... but not structurally superior to concrete + steel.
My ideas are:
- a small jet (like the Learjet), hijacked, stolen or rented by terrorists.
- a fighter plane (sounds fishy though)
- a drone (lots of ppl in the US stick to that idea)
I think the small jet is more likely...
Also there's this general silence from the media. Disturbing.
Ak, we'll know in 30y (or is it 40 ?) when archives go public... In the meatime Oliver Stone will make a movie out of it
