View Single Post
Unread 10-10-2002, 04:45 AM   #100
MadDogMe
Thermophile
 
MadDogMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
Default

Quote:
all are well advised to spend the time and effort to absorb Dave Smith's (myv65) articles
Modesty too!! ...

Quote:
so many people still insist that aluminum is better at getting rid of heat while copper is better at absorbing it. Yeah, like metals have a brain and can decide to behave differently depending on which way heat is travelling. This is nothing more than confusion over transient vs steady-state conditions.
Transient?, is that after the heatsource has been removed?. I recon ALu cooling faster after heatsource removal has to be the source of the AL/Cu thing/myth , they just carried it over to heatsource~continued without thought!.

I was trying to imagine ALu having the same density as Cu when I asked the 'BillA choker' question , if it was somehow compessed to the size & shape of Cu, I thought it would cool down afterheat the same.
Is heat storage directly related to density?, how far apart are ALu & Cu with conduction?, I know Cu is better but by how much?, do you think density plays any part in that?. is Lead any good for conducting?.
MadDogMe is offline   Reply With Quote