View Single Post
Unread 10-27-2002, 06:46 PM   #34
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

DV
I understand what you did, let me explain what, and why, I'm asking

a 3°C drop due to increased velocity alone is VERY large
the TC-4 with the turbulators is VERY good

the 1250 does not have enough head to boost the flow 'all that much' with the removal of the turbulators
and the re-insertion of different turbulators returns one effectively to about the initial flow rate

you can not get here from there

OR your initial measurements were wrong
OR your subsequent measurements are wrong
therefore I asked if you have some comparable data for the 3 tests

no, a response is NOT : well now it is 3° better . . . .
do/did you record the complete data sets such that others can compare them ?

your claims appear to be inconsistent, and extravagant
but before I suggest that you are blowing smoke, I'm asking to see the data
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote