[BillA]

Hi Gabe,
good to see a mfgr setting the record straight

no debate being initiated,
but in truth there is precious little guidance available to the user as to how to 'set up' the MCW462-UH
while you may "prefer to let hardware review sites define the performance of my products", I will roundly characterize these sites as being incapable of even the most rudimentary measurements
- and such in any case does not address the even more difficult task of 'optimizing' the 462-UH, which is a quite excellent wb with the 'right' connectors
-> and to my mind it is the mfgr who should be providing such guidance (not some ‘know-it-all tester’)

enough of that
"superior to the MCW462-UH by at least 1.5C (all tests equipment/conditions being equal)"
whoo whee, I wonder if you have any idea just how well the 462-UH can (be made to) perform ?
EDIT: the preceding sounds a bit strident;
what is meant is that with a whole bunch of testing to establish an 'optimum', the 462-UH is a very good wb indeed
- the challenge is accepted, 462 vs. 5000

"I'm sure Bill A. will have a blast playing with it too ..."
ahem . . . can we say 'testing' ?
yes, of course - just waiting . . . .