View Single Post
Unread 12-18-2002, 12:21 PM   #5
The Overclocker
Cooling Neophyte
 
The Overclocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered
Owenator is a friend of mine,
but that is a REALLY genuine stupid number

suggest you NOT quote such things, because then YOU look stupid also

EDIT: BTW, I have that particular wb to test as part of JoeC's "Roundup" on OC,
2 weeks or so, several other wbs ahead of it
i do agree that it is a stupid number, but he may be getting those tempratures in his computer, and if so then by his measurements a c/w of 0.07 is true

i dont agree that it makes me look stupid, all i am doping is quoting from the article - the sign as my avatar saying 'im with stupid' makes me look stupid

i dont think you have published the results for you test, when do you plan to, and would you are gree that this type of waterblock is, (when compared to the other types of waterblock that can be made with this tooling) the best option and will give the best performance?

i think it will, which is why i recomended it - the c/w of 0.07 may not be true, but it probably is a better waterblock then the jagged edge (i can provide one if you want to test it)
The Overclocker is offline   Reply With Quote