Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Pritorian · 02-10-2003, 12:49 PM

Well i must say that i do think that Barton does live up to the hype before the release.

As if you look at the links that are provided be BB2K you see that the 3000+ offers a good performance and is a good condtender to the P4´s offering 3,06Ghz.
Sometimes the one is faster then the other but that is all up to what program is running.

But allround i would call it a draw.

One thing that does amaze me is still the fact that @ 2/3 of the clock speed AMD can put of nummbers so close and above to the P4

But as i see it.. if i need RDRAM ($$$$) inn my computer to get the max performance with the P4 i´ll go back to using a AMD again inn my new computer...

but as a little side note.. Barton won´t save then since the P4 3.2 with 200 buss is going to be released inn April i think.. so is time for the Athlon 64/Hammer core!!!! PLEASE!!!

-P-

02-10-2003, 12:49 PM	#8
Pritorian Cooling Savant Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Norway Posts: 201	not so sure..... Well i must say that i do think that Barton does live up to the hype before the release. As if you look at the links that are provided be BB2K you see that the 3000+ offers a good performance and is a good condtender to the P4´s offering 3,06Ghz. Sometimes the one is faster then the other but that is all up to what program is running. But allround i would call it a draw. One thing that does amaze me is still the fact that @ 2/3 of the clock speed AMD can put of nummbers so close and above to the P4 But as i see it.. if i need RDRAM ($$$$) inn my computer to get the max performance with the P4 i´ll go back to using a AMD again inn my new computer... but as a little side note.. Barton won´t save then since the P4 3.2 with 200 buss is going to be released inn April i think.. so is time for the Athlon 64/Hammer core!!!! PLEASE!!! -P- __________________ Boo! Last edited by Pritorian; 02-10-2003 at 01:04 PM.