Quote:
Originally posted by BillA:
No Joe, no bitch.
|
The only person bitching in here is you...
Quote:
Originally posted by BillA:
It was explained to me that you did it to receive free equipment to test. ok, that's your deal, not mine.
|
I am SURE you did not here that from Joe. Joe's heart and soul are in his work. Free equipment? He spent SO MUCH money and time on this machine for his personal pleasure that it ain't even funny. The one thing Joe is NOT is a sell-out.
Quote:
Originally posted by BillA:
The basis of my critical comments has to do with the "design" of the experiment. The more variables, the harder to control, and the harder to understand the results. This is particularly the case when the increment being measured is very small. (If it is below the coefficient of variation for the equipment and procedure, it is invisible.)
Good testing equipment is simple, as are the procedures.
|
DH3 was not an "experiment." It was a watercooling system that all of Joe's future computers will be built into. You get all mathematical and stuff. Joe, myself, and most others around don't build cooling rigs to make our coefficients greater than our increment or whatever... We do it because we find it interesting and fun. I always thought complicated things were cool, but I guess people like yourself need simpler things to understand them.
:/
Look... if you wanted to have a big argument with Joe about which block you think is going to be the best, you should have e-mailed him or done it in another thread.
.
Back to the topic at hand... Lish, I like your choice of components. I would recommend against the Swiftech block. Even IF that block slightly outperforms OCWC's (which I am unsure of... and it will DEFINITELY not beat his silver blocks...), it does not justify the exorbitant price. In agreement w/ Joe, the radiator isn't that great. I have it. It simply cannot keep the water near room temp w/ a 120w pelt.
[This message has been edited by Kevin (edited 01-06-2001).]