The only addition to this discussion. I think anyone can say something is bad. Without explinations or what could be improved, then the arguement cant be backed up as to the reasoning.
Some people cant back them up because the people talking about them have never tested or investigated the item. This is irresponsible. A good basis for judgement will eliminate these questions, and allow the reader to see why. You don't have to improve their product, just state the basis for your decision.
Quote:
|
the problem is that the airflow doesn't appear to be sufficient; the details are sketchy.
|
I agree that the airflow seems to be hampered. How can the heat be transferred to the air? Only the obsessed will have a case that is cool enough inside for this transfer to take place. The average joe wont have case that will allow for circulation inside the case as it appears to require. I would suggest a side mount or open front grill to the outside for heat transfer.