View Single Post
Unread 03-15-2003, 06:29 AM   #117
gmat
Thermophile
 
gmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: France
Posts: 1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Blackeagle
Blair has my respect for doing the hardest thing a elected rep of his people can do. Lead where it isn't populer, but that is yet the right way to go.
That is the difference between Democracy and Dictature.
Democracy = the Power of the People, litterally. People elect someone to be their voice. Not a dictator that imposes his own agenda.
Aren't the USA in Iraq to fight for those ideals ?...

Quote:
Originally posted by Blackeagle

As to the US leadership by Presidant Bush, he does have the majority of the nation behind him, his road is far easier than Blairs.
Last time i checked (last WE) the Americans were between 60% and 70% (from various sources) *against* the war without the support of the UN.

Quote:
Originally posted by Blackeagle

Then let us see how quickly the other nations step up to pay a full membership share.
The USA didn't pay their membership to the UN, it's a well known fact, the USA got a big slap on the wrist for that. On the other hand, other nations did...
And the membership fee is related to the 'richness' of the country. That's only fair.


Quote:
Originally posted by Blackeagle

Only good reason to even stay to that degree is to use the veto to block passage of agendas we dislike.
So the USA want to do that, but no other nation in the world can (like now) ? Hello, this is again the "we're masters of the world so shut up" here.

Quote:
Originally posted by Blackeagle

The Iraqi leadership has had years to disarm and hasn't.
They still have hand guns, and an army. As for nuclear or chemical weapons of mass destruction (ie big ones), no one has found any. Did you ?


Quote:
Originally posted by Blackeagle

I'll not miss Saddam by any means.
No one will. The rest of the world (as opposed to the USA) simply disagree on the means.
gmat is offline