View Single Post
Unread 03-20-2003, 09:04 PM   #9
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

I do not hold with accepting the possession of WMD by certain types
ineligibility is established by word and/or deed, pretty flexible - err on side of conservatism

1) state clearly proscribed WMD 'development'
2) when identified act immediately without prior notice, warning, or demand
3) insert permanent inspection
4) if the 'host' country is not in full active compliant support (which means incarcerating all responsible), remove existing power structure completely

role of UN: none
as it is a political body incapable of concerted (unpopular) action given its structure
- let the UN become an aid agency

this is what is referred to as a benign dictatorship
as I see it (I am not a sheep, and will not be held hostage - period)
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote