Pro/Forums - View Single Post

TerraMex · 03-21-2003, 02:20 AM

davidjr :

I think that's it, but i also think that a reduction in the diameter of the "nozzles" would be better. Having a nozzle the same size as the "pimple" may not be as efficient.

The reduction of the nozzles would , like bb2k said, implicate a large headloss due to the restrictions. However, having a considerable number of those just might compensate.

03-21-2003, 02:20 AM	#18
TerraMex Cooling Savant Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Portugal, Europe Posts: 870	davidjr : I think that's it, but i also think that a reduction in the diameter of the "nozzles" would be better. Having a nozzle the same size as the "pimple" may not be as efficient. The reduction of the nozzles would , like bb2k said, implicate a large headloss due to the restrictions. However, having a considerable number of those just might compensate. __________________ "we need more cowbell."