Pro/Forums - View Single Post

TerraMex · 03-22-2003, 02:06 PM

Im going to loose sleep from people not reading my posts....

Those are valid issues that need to be taken in consideration when dealing with a complex situation like north korea, or any other for that matter. You cant just say "they're evil and that's that". Knowing what drives them is knowing the main issues of the problem.

Or you're having difficulties in understanting the post...? I can rewrite it in or make it more simple. I know my english isnt that good.

>which are always debatable

Everything usually is. But most of what i said i find it valid, and alot of it based in facts, past and current events. Feel free to argue with them.

>Perhaps a refinement or a clarification of the term WMD
>might be in order. Exactly what does this include, and
>not include?

I was thinking the same thing. There are clear differences between biological, chemical and nuclear WMD ... and a few others .

phreenet :

What i've stated before whas a good deal of direct help to the general population can have a change in the government atittude, and combined with a good diplomatic relations , and trade relations (including south korea) can make a change in the WMD program. It's about "killing" the paranoia and making a good stable enviorment for North and South Korea. However i dont think that will stop the missile industry. A little pressure is in order, but not by military intervention.

03-22-2003, 02:06 PM	#43
TerraMex Cooling Savant Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Portugal, Europe Posts: 870	Im going to loose sleep from people not reading my posts.... Those are valid issues that need to be taken in consideration when dealing with a complex situation like north korea, or any other for that matter. You cant just say "they're evil and that's that". Knowing what drives them is knowing the main issues of the problem. Or you're having difficulties in understanting the post...? I can rewrite it in or make it more simple. I know my english isnt that good. >which are always debatable Everything usually is. But most of what i said i find it valid, and alot of it based in facts, past and current events. Feel free to argue with them. >Perhaps a refinement or a clarification of the term WMD >might be in order. Exactly what does this include, and >not include? I was thinking the same thing. There are clear differences between biological, chemical and nuclear WMD ... and a few others . phreenet : What i've stated before whas a good deal of direct help to the general population can have a change in the government atittude, and combined with a good diplomatic relations , and trade relations (including south korea) can make a change in the WMD program. It's about "killing" the paranoia and making a good stable enviorment for North and South Korea. However i dont think that will stop the missile industry. A little pressure is in order, but not by military intervention. __________________ "we need more cowbell." Last edited by TerraMex; 03-22-2003 at 02:11 PM.