Quote:
It's folly to think there's "enough to go around"
AND they are working on these issues and reaching valid conclusions.
|
If you look at the waste in the world, and expanse of unpopulated areas I believe your argument speculative and argumentative. I share a different opinion.
One mans or entity's valid conclusion is another mans denial of freedom. In fact I don't see most if any of the UN's decisions valid. Any "government like entitity" such as the UN
or governement that feels that they are impowered to serilize, provide abortions, or 'reach a valid conclusion' as to how many children someone has withouth consent to that individual is a denial of freedom. It is not up to the UN to deny freedoms or regulate populations, but to provide aid, and promote freedom. Freedom FROM a life of ones choosing, (ie. children) is not freedom at all in my opinion.
I rebuke population birth 'control' from any entity. No one knows better the environments suitability than parents. If they wish to bring a child into the world, it is their choice. It amuses me to see that the same people who support 'right to death' don't give the same support to 'right to life'. None of this conversation relays to the topic of the board, so I won't comment anymore on this.