Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered
jd
its comments like the one you quoted that make me want to write really technically rigorious articles
then the chuckle heads would not even bother to read them
|
Oh come now BillA, surely testing without correcting for any other factors, at a single point, with one sample is far better than your method because . . . the block isn't sideways.
Kinda makes you wonder if these people failed out of high school science. Didn't even high school classes expect more rigorous testing than they claim is better than BillA's? Ah well, those ones will always outnumber everyone else. :shrug: