View Single Post
Unread 04-22-2003, 12:04 PM   #62
Since87
Pro/Guru - Uber Mod
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 834
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered

Since87 - did you adjust for such with the rad data ?
I didn't make any attempt to account for variations in tank geometry or inlet/outlet tubing size.

I just lumped all that into the 'overhead' factor mentioned above. For the simulated results, I added the same 'overhead' flow resistance as a single 'component' in series with the tubing flow resistance, for all three heatercores.

I'm interested in seeing the results for the reversed flow test. I'm not really expecting to see much difference, but if there is a clear difference it will be an indication that tank geometry, etc. is a significant factor. That would put a serious kink in our ability to generate models based on a few easily obtainable measurements.

More later.

Edit: Corrected "four heatercores" to three heatercores".

Last edited by Since87; 04-22-2003 at 12:22 PM.
Since87 is offline   Reply With Quote