Airspirit: if you want to defy the conventional understanding of the differences between "law" and "theory", you'll find yourself very much on your own.
It isn't difficult to find evidence that supports Darwin's theory, but that's the limit of it.
There are many theories about how the universe started, and you'll find that a lot of the existing evidence actually supports more than one theory!
The thing is, it's just a theory, and it's not a law because it can't be irrefutably proven. In Darwin's case, it's simply generally accepted, for lack of anything better. Who knows, maybe Darwin was off by a bit, maybe he wasn't detailed enough, maybe he missed something...
|