So, I guess it gets back to my first post on the subject:
"That is a really murky statement. If you can assume that heat is being pulled more efficiently into the water via the block (like a WW when compared to a Senfu), then naturally the water will be a little warmer, and this would cause the radiator to transfer more heat. How they stated it, though, is really stupid, and is a case of making alot of noise about nothing ... and stating it backwards perhaps to deliberately confuse the customer and hopefully gaining a sale because of the long-winded description that means that it has to be good ... right? They should have summed it up as "a more efficient water block.""
While the change in water temperature doesn't matter to any measurable degree, it is still there. That manufacturer/retailer was trying to explain why their part was the shiznit because of the warmer water statement. I was basically trying to say that going into that level of irrelevant detail doesn't serve the customer well, and in the end the whole thing could be summed up as: a more efficient block.
We've now gone full circle. *sigh*
__________________
#!/bin/sh {who;} {last;} {pause;} {grep;} {touch;} {unzip;} mount /dev/girl -t {wet;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} echo yes yes yes {yes;} umount {/dev/girl;zip;} rm -rf {wet.spot;} {sleep;} finger: permission denied
|