Quote:
|
Ah, the "because it's easier to comprehend" argument.
|
Yes, that is what we do. We have to consider the evidence and see what is more credible. Part of understanding is accepting what you don't understand and can't place under a microscope. No scientist says "i understand it all" and is considered credible. The credible ones start by stating what the do not know, and what new questions they have learned to ask.
I can't accept evolution personally, due to its being as non-fictional as a James Bond film. Humility, and science work together better than outright fiction and creation of "facts" if the picture is too blurry to make out. What we do know, is that the longer you stare at the theory of E, the more faith you have to apply to it. If that is the kind of "truth" that lets you sleep well at night, then you must have wonderful memories of the tooth fairy. Afterall, there is no other way that money could have been placed under your pillow.
Of course I can not fault someone for faith in something they have never seen. I have attempted to proove the Biblical teachings false, but I cannot. Frankly if Creationism was as "solid" of a case as Evolution, it wouldn't have made it past 2-3 centuries. Creation has been a theory for 2 thousand years without being disproven. Maybe that will help some people give it some more consideration.
Thanks for hearing me out guys. I do not mean any disrespect to your understandings my presenting my own findings.