HAHHAHA!!
Quote:
|
Armed robbery is a violent crime, Socialism is not
|
No, its not a violent CRIME
But a crime none the less.
Please refer to my previous post on who pays the taxes. If you want more taxes, you give incentives to the wealthy who pay 50+% of them. So each change you make benifiting them, the more revenue you derive to spend on the group that provides 3% of the revenue.
So theoretically, if you don't understand this, wish to tax MORE, and want to get votes from leeches, you promise the biggest cuts to 50%the people who only provide 3%. This way you buy votes with the least amount of money, while keeping a disproportionately high tax burden on the rich. And you do this all in the name of "human goodness". This politician realises that he/she can spend more of the money of those whom didn't vote them in to buy more for the people who didn't work for it.
People don't understand that if you wish to cut taxes, you must do it for the middle class and rich. A tax cut to the people giving the 3% really isn't a cut at all! So, if you cut that 3% tax burden, you are actually promoting them to contribute to society even LESS with incentives.
If you lower taxes on the upper middle, you allow them to accumulate THEIR wealth and they get raised into the higher tax bracket. If they do that you allow them to become the highest contributers in the entire equation. What I don't understand is the highest contributers which pay wages for the rest of the country are the bad guys. Evil Evil Evil hand that feeds me. Creating wealth in a country NEVER hurt the economy that feeds everyone.