Quote:
Originally posted by Tuff
JayDee...someone steal your name...Normally I would not expect to see these kind of claims from you.
Guage it with a Maze 4<-------gee...like I never heard the last of it from you when I did such a thing with a Maze 3.
I will use less jets than Cathar and the Clones...You forget about surface area?
Its nice that you are again making blocks...but lose the newbieness and get back to what works.
Jets are aligned with the tops....what about flow...you argued my post saying it would not work...now "YOU DO IT"
I have a name for your new block...Call it the Foot in the Mouth Block.
Ahhh....yes..this feels good.
Tuff
|
LOL, you still can't get it through your head eh? You where comparing CATHARS results with your results. If you just used YOUR maze 3 and shut up about Cathars it would have been a little different. And where is you quality of testing? Your onboard probe reads over 5C in swings in less than 9 seconds!!! And WTF do you mean I am doing it now? My first version of this was REV 1 several months before ANYONE was posting their versions. Did you not read in Cathars posts where he got the ideas for the Cascade? Did you not see my name along with a few others? I guess your quick to forget and slow to learn. Bad combo...
Anyway aside from the ignorant fool, the Jet Block #2 sucks balls because there is no flow. My 500GPH Hydrothruster is brought to its knees. I suspected it would. The holes are just not deep enough and I should have taken another 1/6" off the acrylic channel around the pipes. Thats what I get for designing and building this block in less than 15minutes.
Jet block #1 however showed decent flow with the smaller 200GPH pump. I will get it put together again and slap it on maybe tomorrow.
How ever it works out these will be the last version of the Jet blocks. I have a few ideas using the jets in other types of applications other than direct impingment.