Quote:
Originally posted by bigben2k
Thanks Lee.
Guys, we've been over this before.
The wild temp swings actually come from Sandra. CPUBurn works better at maintaining a steady temp, for load testing. Incidentally, that's what JD uses...
|
This is not so. I HAVE Sandra on my test bed and use it aswell. After equilibrium has set in under load I NEVER see a swing of over 1C (for hours and hours!) and thats on the Thermocoupler aswell as the onboard! You simply do not get 5C swings. Thats like going from idle to load. Only time I EVER see a 5C+ swing is from hitting the start button and loading into windows and that still takes over 20 seconds! And the TC picks it up WWWWWAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY before the onboard does. It takes a couple minutes for the onboard to read a 5C swing. Unless it is busted of course!
Quote:
|
You two (Tuff, JayDee116) really need to try to get along!
|
Why? :shrug:
Quote:
Tuff, you just need to come forward, and say how you tested your block, and what your reference point was. As JayDee stated, you can't use someone else's temps as a reference point: you have to get a known block, and compare yours to it, under the same conditions, and you have to do it a few times, to make sure that you account for the TIM joint variations.
That's exactly what JD is doing, and he's got it right. I'm sure he hasn't tested it more than a couple of times, but he's still prototyping: when he's got a final product, I'm sure he'll put it through the ringer. 
|
How many times does this need to be feed to him? I thought we went into detail over and over across multiple threads on this issue and would think it would have gotten through by now, but everytime I think that here he comes again with the same BS as before! And this time trying to flame ME! BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Like I said, quick to forget and slow to learn.. A bad combo! This has been a hoot though!