Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered
jd
tighten your focus a bit
I'm getting ragged on because I put up his name and e-mail
you call this 'spamming' ? how about candor ?
is my name and e-mail a secret ?
get real, you seem to be defending him based on his word alone
look at what is known to be a fact:
- an agreement was reached between the 2 parties, a price fixed, and 50% pmt made
- after a period passed, with excuses for non/late delivery being made by the seller, the buyer was no longer able to get a response from the seller
- the seller had 'reasons' to 'explain' this lack of response
- the seller claims to have shipped the parts, the buyer claims to never have received anything
- and the buyer claims to not have received a request for the balance due, and obviously did not pay the balance due having - it is asserted - not received anything
- the seller returned the initial deposit
case closed one would think – except that the seller remains on the offensive ??
do you remember Chip Eckert ?
do you remember Una ?
a diddle by non-delivery is not acceptable
my suspicion is that the seller was ignoring a situation of his making,
and when shown up chose a good offense as the best defense
no Ben, I received no PM (sweeping the details under the rug ?)
ah, a secret defense to enlist supporters
I doubt your qualifications as an arbiter Ben, the ability to reason critically is crucial to such
-> an example of this deficit is the inability to understand my previous post - did you attempt to correlate it to that of the sellers ?
|
Yes I am basing it on his word alone as I have e-mailed him and asked his side of the story and he gave it. I also have talked with him in these forums, my forums, and through e-mails before for a long time now. I have NO reason not to take his word for it. He is not interested in ripping someone off for $90 as that is a drop in the well for him. He got $1,000's just in equipment alone. He is not going to intentionally do anything to ruin his name around the web. From what he says and what I see in another thread here Michael is the majority of this whole problem. Ever get one of the customers that is just never satisfied no matter how much shit they drag you through?
Sure we might be making to big a deal about the name and e-mail as we can find that and more on the net, but you guys shouldn't be so quick to jump on someone over this and make a judgment instanlty that the complainer is 100% right and just. I hate getting ripped off as much as anyone as I just got ripped off on e-bay for a dead A7V333. Shit happens. Liquid got in a situation he regrets and has paid his dues and then some. We shouldn't be the judge, jury, and executioner with only a small percentage of evidence. Certainly shouldn't be passing around info. The guy abviously knows LiquidRulez name and e-mail addy as he claims to have all of LiquidRulez e-mails. Is there really a need for the rest of the world to?
Good thing the justice system doesn't work like this. We would have been fried by now.