Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Blackeagle · 08-24-2003, 05:22 PM

AS a rad that size is bound to require a exterior mounting set up, why not 2-192 which is larger yet. And due to it's more square shape should have lower resistence due to the larger number of tubes per pass & slightly shorter passes.

The heat from 3 TEC's + 3 O/Ced chips + pump heat = A heck of a lot of watts! !

So the more cooling the better.

What pump, fans & blocks do you intend to use for this set up?

Edit:

2-192 10.75 X 10.25 X 2 = 220.375 cubic inches of volume.

A solid 10% increase in rad size, yet should offer lower head loss.

Should make for a extremely powerfull system! Congrats !

08-24-2003, 05:22 PM	#2
Blackeagle Thermophile Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: U.S.A = Michigan Posts: 1,243	AS a rad that size is bound to require a exterior mounting set up, why not 2-192 which is larger yet. And due to it's more square shape should have lower resistence due to the larger number of tubes per pass & slightly shorter passes. The heat from 3 TEC's + 3 O/Ced chips + pump heat = A heck of a lot of watts! ! So the more cooling the better. What pump, fans & blocks do you intend to use for this set up? Edit: 2-192 10.75 X 10.25 X 2 = 220.375 cubic inches of volume. A solid 10% increase in rad size, yet should offer lower head loss. Should make for a extremely powerfull system! Congrats ! Last edited by Blackeagle; 08-24-2003 at 05:34 PM.