Quote:
Originally posted by Les
Originates from an inconclusive discussion:
http://forums.overclockers.com.au/sh...threadid=67401
The Off-forum,rather inadequate analysis of the data should be treated very cautiously.
To assume the same TIM Joint resistance for different wbs is dangerous and can lead to possibly erroneous conclusions.For example would suspect that the fly-cut(?) surface of "The Cascade" produces a lower TIM joint resistance than the hand-lapped " White-Water".Think it is inconclusive that the reduction in temperatures for "The Cascade" is due to lower Convective Resistance and not due to a lower TIM Joint resistance.
|
In other words, there is no conclusive evidence that the design itself is truly a step forward as implemented. Wow Les, that's layin some smack down.