Quote:
Originally posted by Cathar
Seemed to me to be a decent value to be working with, agreed though, until we know more.
I guess it's a case of what's better?
1) No information at all?
2) False (marketing) information?
3) Some rudimentary testing information?
4) Some decently obtained testing information until disproven?
If we're going to apply any form of theory as to what to expect from direct-die, it would seem to me that people would want to have at least a vague idea of what they're working with/against, rather than no idea at all?
|
Information -Yes.
But unreferenced speculation or possibly misinformation - No